'OFF WITH THE FAIRIES': The Jackie O v Kyle case that's ripping the lid off Australia's workplace bullying epidemic

When Jackie "O" Henderson walked out of a KIIS FM studio on the morning of February 20, 2026, she was not only stepping away from one of the most lucrative broadcasting partnerships in Australian media history — she was shining a spotlight on how Australian workplaces handle bullying.

Share
'OFF WITH THE FAIRIES': The Jackie O v Kyle case that's ripping the lid off Australia's workplace bullying epidemic
Credit: Supplied

The dispute between Henderson, long-time co-host Kyle Sandilands and their former employer ARN Media has escalated dramatically in recent weeks.

Henderson is suing ARN for at least $82 million, alleging wrongful termination, failure to provide a safe workplace, and unlawful retaliation after she formally complained about Sandilands' on-air conduct.

Sandilands has launched his own $85 million claim, arguing his termination was invalid and that his behaviour was simply "congruent" with the "robust character" ARN expected him to perform.

This week, ARN hit back, suing both broadcasters to recover lost advertising revenue, legal costs and millions of dollars in bonuses.

The latest salvo in a battle that now spans multiple Federal Court proceedings and tens of millions of dollars.

But strip away the dollar signs, and the case tells a story that will feel uncomfortably familiar to thousands of Australian workers.

The flashpoint — and the complaints before it

The on-air incident that ended the Kyle and Jackie O partnership centred on an astrology birth chart segment during which Sandilands lashed Henderson's interest in the subject.

"Your fixation on this has made you almost unworkable," he told her on air, accusing her of being "off with the fairies with this s—, it's mental."

He also suggested her focus on astrology made her sound like "a drug addict" — comments that cut deeply given Henderson has previously spoken about seeking treatment for addiction in 2022.

Henderson responded that the attack was "so unfair" and added: "I would never say things like that about you."

But crucially, Henderson's legal team say this was not an isolated blow-up.

Federal Court documents show Henderson had raised concerns with senior ARN executives as early as August 2025 — six months before the on-air rupture.

During one August broadcast, Sandilands allegedly dismissed Henderson's remarks as "psycho-babble," telling her "you'll never find anyone because there is, all of these requirements that you have."

When Henderson said "don't attack me," he reportedly replied: "This is talking, this isn't attacking… you need to drop all the hype words."

She later walked out of the studio after telling him he was "pushing her too far."

A letter from her lawyers stated bluntly: "There is evidence that she has endured persistent and relentless bullying by Mr Sandilands well before the 20 February 2026 incident, which, despite numerous opportunities, the Group has failed to adequately address both at law and ethically."

A national problem by the numbers

While the Kyle and Jackie O case is remarkable for its scale, celebrity and drama, the underlying issue is anything but unusual.

Data from Allianz Australia's national workers' compensation portfolio shows psychological injury claims linked to workplace bullying and harassment have surged 75.7 per cent between 2021 and 2025.

Bullying and harassment now account for 39.5 per cent of all active mental injury claims and 39.5 per cent of all active workers' compensation claims nationally.

Employees aged 50 to 60 are carrying the heaviest share of those claims, but millennials have recorded a 34.78 per cent relative increase in bullying-related psychological claims over the same period, with Gen Z following the same trajectory.

Research by Bully Zero goes even further, describing workplace bullying in Australia as having reached "epidemic" levels — with seven in ten Australians reporting they have experienced bullying at some point, and more than a quarter encountering it at work.

Bullying in Australia wears many faces

The cases making their way through Australian courts and tribunals are a sobering reminder that workplace bullying is not confined to celebrity radio studios.

A WorkSafe Victoria case study details the experience of "M," who started as a plumbing apprentice at 16 and was repeatedly called homophobic slurs and subjected to offensive language by his boss.

His employer was convicted under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 and fined $12,500.

At a commercial bakery, four employees were subjected to years of verbal, physical and emotional abuse, being called "pig," "porky," "dog" and other derogatory names by their boss.

One said she had "lost my friends, my life, my world and my mind."

The employer was fined $50,000.

At Cowra Meat in regional NSW, evidence emerged that a supervisor had witnessed an employee directing "extreme racial slurs" at Pacific Islander colleagues — with no formal investigation, warning or record following.

And the courts are increasingly willing to find that even less dramatic behaviour constitutes bullying.

Recent decisions have found that an employee who ignored a colleague's greetings, belittled her contributions and failed to acknowledge her work engaged in bullying conduct.

Another decision described an employee as generally "rude" and "socially inept" — and upheld his removal to an office 350 kilometres away as justified serious misconduct.

Victoria's new Occupational Health and Safety (Psychological Health) Regulations 2025 — which came into effect on December 1, 2025 — require employers to identify and control psychosocial hazards, not just physical ones.

Queensland has similar obligations under its Risk of Psychosocial Hazards Code of Practice.

NSW formally adopted the Healthcare and Social Assistance Industry Code of Practice on February 20, 2026, requiring systematic management of psychosocial hazards including aggression, harassment and violence.

For ARN, Sandilands and Henderson, the stakes are enormous.

For the rest of Australia's workforce, the case is simply the highest-profile version of a conversation happening in offices, factories, construction sites and studios across the country — a conversation about where robust culture ends, where bullying begins, and who is responsible when silence allows harm to fester.

If you or someone you know is experiencing workplace bullying, contact the Fair Work Commission, your state WHS regulator, or seek support through Lifeline on 13 11 14.